0.04/0.13 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_15756 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 13:07:07 EDT 2023 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.20/0.49 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5T0srmzSi/Vampire---4.8_15756 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA. 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh3l with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_ho_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # sh3l with pid 16085 completed with status 0 0.20/0.51 # Result found by sh3l 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA. 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh3l with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 0.20/0.51 # Search class: HGHSF-FFMM11-SSSFFFBN 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.20/0.51 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 98s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 16090 completed with status 0 0.20/0.51 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSSA. 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.20/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_unif with 900s (5) cores 0.20/0.51 # Starting sh3l with 180s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # SinE strategy is gf120_gu_RUU_F100_L01000 0.20/0.51 # Search class: HGHSF-FFMM11-SSSFFFBN 0.20/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.20/0.51 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 98s (1) cores 0.20/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.20/0.51 0.20/0.51 # Proof found! 0.20/0.51 # SZS status Theorem 0.20/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_28, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_33, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_37, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_39, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_46, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_53, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_54, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_58, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.20/0.51 thf(decl_60, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.20/0.51 thf(con, conjecture, ?[X23:$i > $i > $o, X24:$i > $i > $o, X19:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((((X23 @ X19 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&~(((X24)=(X23))))&(X24 @ X19 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5T0srmzSi/Vampire---4.8_15756', con)). 0.20/0.51 thf(ax_014, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5T0srmzSi/Vampire---4.8_15756', ax_014)). 0.20/0.51 thf(ax_004, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5T0srmzSi/Vampire---4.8_15756', ax_004)). 0.20/0.51 thf(ax_010, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5T0srmzSi/Vampire---4.8_15756', ax_010)). 0.20/0.51 thf(ax_021, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.X5T0srmzSi/Vampire---4.8_15756', ax_021)). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X23:$i > $i > $o, X24:$i > $i > $o, X19:$i]:(((~((((X23 @ X19 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&((X24)!=(X23)))&(X24 @ X19 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((((X23 @ X19 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&((X24)!=(X23)))&(X24 @ X19 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X43:$i > $i > $o, X44:$i > $i > $o, X45:$i]:((((((~(X43 @ X45 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X44)=(X43))|~(X44 @ X45 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X43 @ X45 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X43 @ X45 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(X43 @ X45 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X44)=(X43))|~(X44 @ X45 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|((X44)!=(X43)))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|((X44)!=(X43)))))&((~(X43 @ X45 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X44)=(X43))|~(X44 @ X45 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(X44 @ X45 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X44 @ X45 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))))&((~(X43 @ X45 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|((X44)=(X43))|~(X44 @ X45 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_7, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_014])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X23:$i > $i > $o, X24:$i > $i > $o]:((~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true))))|((X23)!=(X24)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_9, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_11, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_12, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_13, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X24:$i > $i > $o, X23:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:((((X24)=(X23))|~((X23 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((X24 @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_15, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_17, axiom, ((~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_010])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X24:$i > $i > $o, X23:$i > $i > $o, X1:$i]:((((X23)=(X24))|~((X24 @ X1 @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))|~((X23 @ X1 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_19, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X23:$i > $i > $o]:((((X23)=(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI))|~((X23 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_22, plain, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI)=(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X50:$i, X51:$i, X23:$i > $i > $o]:((((X23 @ X50 @ X51)<=>(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X50 @ X51))|~((X23 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X52:$i, X53:$i]:(((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X52 @ X53)<=>(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X52 @ X53))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X23:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X23 @ X1 @ X2)|~((X23 @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_27, plain, (((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_021])])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i]:(((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(dynamic_cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X1:$i]:((((lAnna_THFTYPE_i)=(X1))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X2 @ X1)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_26])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_30, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28, c_0_12])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ((lBill_THFTYPE_i)=(lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_19])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_33, plain, ~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_10])). 0.20/0.51 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_32]), c_0_33]), ['proof']). 0.20/0.51 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.20/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 128 0.20/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 106 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses : 52 0.20/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 4 0.20/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 48 0.20/0.51 # Processed clauses : 104 0.20/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 16 0.20/0.51 # ...subsumed : 30 0.20/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 58 0.20/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.20/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.20/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.20/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 15 0.20/0.51 # Generated clauses : 69 0.20/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 60 0.20/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.20/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.20/0.51 # Paramodulations : 32 0.20/0.51 # Factorizations : 0 0.20/0.51 # NegExts : 0 0.20/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 1 0.20/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 45 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0 0.20/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.20/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.20/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.20/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.20/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 24 0.20/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 8 0.20/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.20/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 5 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 11 0.20/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 18 0.20/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 41 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.20/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 33 0.20/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 104 0.20/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83 0.20/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 26 0.20/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1 0.20/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5 0.20/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 4 0.20/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 104 0.20/0.51 # Condensation successes : 1 0.20/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 4458 0.20/0.51 0.20/0.51 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.008 s 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.003 s 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.011 s 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1900 pages 0.20/0.51 0.20/0.51 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.20/0.51 # User time : 0.010 s 0.20/0.51 # System time : 0.006 s 0.20/0.51 # Total time : 0.016 s 0.20/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages 0.20/0.51 % E---3.1 exiting 0.20/0.51 EOF